1995 Jetta 2.0 clutch and flywheel question

Volkswagen Forum VW Classifieds Photo Gallery Search Contact VWF
News Forum FAQ Sponsors Calendars Member List VW Recalls TSBs Timeslips Register Login

1995 Jetta 2.0 clutch and flywheel question

Printable Version

Volkswagen Forum >> VW MODELS >> Volkswagen Jetta >> 1995 Jetta 2.0 clutch and flywheel question

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

1995 Jetta 2.0 clutch and flywheel question - 9/10/2008 4:57:11 PM

jw003

Posts: 1
Joined: 9/10/2008
Status: offline

Im replacing my clutch in my jetta and i was wondering about a few things if anyone could help me out. I was wondering if anyone knows the stock size and weight of the flywheel because i was thinking about maybe getting a lighter one. I was also wondering what the difference between the dampened, pre-dampened and non dapened clutches are. Any help would be appreciated.

Post #: 1

RE: 1995 Jetta 2.0 clutch and flywheel question - 9/10/2008 5:49:16 PM

Jrailer

Posts: 720
Joined: 12/8/2007
Status: offline

they put springs in the clutch disc to move alittle as you let it out this helps to keep it from chattering or breaking appart
dont know abought pre dampened
the 1.8 turbos have a duelmass flywheel that acts as the dapper and has a solid disc

if this is what you are meaning by dampened
dont know the weight of the flywheel they arnt very heavy on the older 2.0

_____________________________

http://air2water.2ksite.com/

(in reply to jw003)

Post #: 2

RE: 1995 Jetta 2.0 clutch and flywheel question - 9/10/2008 10:57:01 PM

SwedishGP

Posts: 801
Joined: 7/9/2008
Status: offline

never mind I threw in my two cents about a 1.8t clutch upgrade, didnt realize it was a 95.

< Message edited by SwedishGP -- 9/10/2008 10:58:17 PM >

_____________________________

Check out http://www.myspace.com/swedishgp where you can see my artwork and progression into a great ink slinger...

Fully Domained Air 2 Water site Jan 09'', Vegas Meet June 09''...................

Click Here: http://air2water.2ksite.com

(in reply to Jrailer)

Post #: 3