what should you be driving?
Login | |
|
|
|
|
|
RE: what should you be driving? - 4/30/2005 10:04:44 AM
|
|
|
low04gix6
Posts: 64
Joined: 4/15/2005 Status: offline
|
well it got me right, i got a 1990 supra turbo. if it were up to me it would be a 1990 180sx tho. but ill take a turbo supra!!!
_____________________________
04 jetta GLI 87 cabriolet 04 suzuki gsx-r 600
|
|
|
|
RE: what should you be driving? - 4/30/2005 3:20:37 PM
|
|
|
patrick
Posts: 210
Joined: 2/16/2005 Status: offline
|
i would also take the supra...
|
|
|
|
RE: what should you be driving? - 5/31/2005 2:04:51 PM
|
|
|
CasualJesus
Posts: 1
Joined: 5/29/2005 Status: offline
|
'00 Honda Civic. WTF?
|
|
|
|
RE: what should you be driving? - 5/31/2005 4:16:56 PM
|
|
|
patrick
Posts: 210
Joined: 2/16/2005 Status: offline
|
haha....not your thing?!
|
|
|
|
RE: what should you be driving? - 6/14/2005 5:12:54 PM
|
|
|
Paul
Posts: 4
Joined: 6/14/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
You scored as 00' audi A4. You like luxury and like to keep your car fairly stock for you know its already nice. 00' audi A4 88% 00' Honda Civic 88% 90' Turbo Supra 63% 03' Mustang SVT Cobra 50% 02' Mazda Miata 50% 99' Mitsu Eclipse GSX 38% 05' Cobalt SS 38% Ford Focus ZX3 02' 38% 87' Z28 Camaro IROC 25% Aston Martin Vanquish 25% 02' Xtreme Blazer 25% Trans Am 13% 64\' Impala 0% 91' Geo Storm 0%
|
|
|
|
RE: what should you be driving? - 12/26/2005 9:40:43 AM
|
|
|
pmason
Posts: 4
Joined: 12/24/2005 Status: offline
|
woot apparently I should be driving an Aston Martin Vanquish
_____________________________
want to improve your odds of winning the lottery check out my home page
|
|
|
|
RE: what should you be driving? - 12/26/2005 11:55:34 AM
|
|
|
Jsd
Posts: 368
Joined: 9/20/2005 Status: offline
|
90' Turbo Supra but i'd prefer a 68' Dodge Charger, Blown... But I'm getting a 2000 Grand Prix GT, and putting a Turbo in it
_____________________________
NOS is for cowards.
|
|
|
|
RE: what should you be driving? - 12/27/2005 12:06:21 PM
|
|
|
patrick
Posts: 210
Joined: 2/16/2005 Status: offline
|
why not find a GTP, and it will already be blown?
|
|
|
|
RE: what should you be driving? - 12/27/2005 8:10:35 PM
|
|
|
Jsd
Posts: 368
Joined: 9/20/2005 Status: offline
|
lol yeah, GTP's are slow, only 30 or so more horse than a GT, the supercharger on the GTP is nothing to rave about, and typicall superchargers are far less more efficient than turbo's and actually aid in burning more fuel when you tweak it for performance. I do contract work for a company that builds a kit specifically for the Grand PRix, GT/GTP. You could essentially buy a bigger and better supercharger but at more cost and less horsepower than a turbo. As well, turbo's don't rob from the engine, versus a turbo that merely uses wasted exhaust to drive the turbine. As well, GTP are rated as such and result in higher insurance premiums for a not very fast car versus a GT which is far cheaper. I will though, eventually build up a GTP engine, which is the L67 since the L36 isn't built for high boost. L67 has perfect compression ratio for maximum performance. The engines are actually fairly cheap to buy ready to go. I know more about the GP than any other car, even my FAV 68' charger. hahaha...
_____________________________
NOS is for cowards.
|
|
|
|
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
Make A Donation
Forum Rules & FAQ
RSS Feeds
Volkswagen Prices
Advertising Info
|
Contact Us |
Advertising |
Automotive Links |
Volkswagen Links |
About Us |
Archive |
Legal |
Privacy Policy |
© Volkswagen Forum
Volkswagen Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Volkswagen AG.
|