|
Joelzy -> RE: Supercharge or Turbo?? (8/23/2006 9:31:15 AM)
|
Alright ill bite, But know ahead of time i am no expert, and these are my thoughts and opinions based on what i have picked up. you know that bagel but others may not. so turbo or supercharger?... that is the question. It has been my understanding that a turbo would be better for a car that is starting out naturally aspirated. Superchargers use the pulleys to force air in, which in turn uses up precious horsepower just to push the charger. you smell what im steppin in??? It has to waste HP in order to make more. Turbos boost off the exhaust, which is an amazing invention... i think Alfred Buchi was on some good drugs when he came up with it in the early 1900's, anyway... back to the subject at hand, turbos have the lag because it takes exhaust pushing the turbine to make boost, so when youre taking off, the boost will be kinda low until the exhaust catches up. But to be honest, once you learn how to drive with the trubo lag, you can almost eliminate it. and i dont know what the difference in a v6 and a 4 cylinder would be for lag, but i would guess you wouldhave less considering your car is puting out more power on its own. Now talkin about twins, i think thats gettin a little out there. single would kick major @$$ i think, and twins would be so much more expensive and more work just to make them worth while. thats my opinion. pretty sure a single would make that car scream. check these out when you get a chance, pretty good info on both http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbocharger http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercharger hope that helps, others on here know more than me so hopefully theyll chip in Thats about all i got for now, joelzy out!
|
|
|
|